Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters


Marketing To Teens: Avoiding Health Or Warning Letters

A secretive e cigarette company which includes captured huge amount of money in profits annually by exploiting a loophole has said it is temporarily suspending sales in the U.S. till further notice. However, despite the news, the company’s website still lists several other countries where the product is available. The company, based in Canada, markets podsmall.com Puff Bar being an electronic cigarette that can be used just like a regular cigarette. The only difference is that when you light up Puff Bar, it mimics the looks and feel of a genuine cigarette. Actually, some consumers have compared the puffing action of the product compared to that of a cigarette, and smokers around the world have embraced the brand new product with both of your hands.

Puff Bar

The Puff Bar was launched in Canada in January, with plans to enter other countries shortly. In spite of the recent launch, the web site still lists several countries where the product is not available. Among the countries list is the U.S., where in fact the product is specifically targeted at younger consumers. The U.S. is not the only country where the Puff Bar cannot currently be purchased. Based on the website, there are no plans to release the merchandise in the U.S., although it remains the goal of the company to make the product available in the U.S.

A company representative in Canada told Canadian television station CPolitics that there was “no immediate plan” to sell the Puff Bar in the U.S. She denied reports in the media that the business was considering bringing the product to the American market, and instead referred all inquiries to the European company’s home country. The representative did not mention the loophole that allowed the merchandise to be sold in Europe, or the chance that the loophole had been discovered before the product was launched in Canada. The U.S. patent office has ordered the trademark to be granted to both names used to create the e cigarette, which are Smaxx and Vapro. Because the Puff Bar continues to be illegal in the U.S., it could be problematic for manufacturers to ship their products into the country.

There are a few arguments against allowing flavored e cigarettes in the U.S. Many public health experts fear that flavored the Cigs contain a level of nicotine that’s too much to be healthy. In addition they fear that children may be enticed to smoke with flavors that interest their more sensitive psychological needs. One reason that the U.S. patent office has allowed the Puff Bar to be sold in Canada is because of its safety. The merchandise is regulated by Canadian law and must meet standard quality controls.

The Puff Bar also appears to be safer than its pre-filled counterparts. It generally does not contain any nicotine and only contains a small amount of propylene glycol, an ingredient that is commonly used to promote cleanliness preventing greasy foods from spreading. The propylene glycol in the Puff Bar also serves to help make the product appealing to younger consumers, since it tastes good.

Like all vaporizers, the Puff Bar also allows users to remove nicotine without using real tobacco. The ingredients in puffs ensure that there is no contact between the smoker’s mouth and the product, thus eliminating the chance for nicotine to be absorbed through your skin. Unlike a traditional cigarette, an individual does not have to carry the Puff Bar set up. With the puff bar, the entire surface of the device is covered with heat-sensitive material, which means that the Puff Bar will not emit smoke.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration are still examining the Puff Bar to find out whether or not it takes its hazard to public health. This loophole in international patent law allows manufactures to advertise their products predicated on names that not represent any health dangers, such as “The Puff”. The loophole in U.S. patent law allows manufacturers to capitalize on potential names that sound much like well-known brands without developing a public health risk. For example, one company has trademarked the term “Candy” and developed several variations of its product, including candy bar and mixed bag candy bar. The lack of health or trademark significance will not appear to have hindered the business from selling these products to the public.

The lack of health or warning letters on each of the major tobacco products can help contribute to the existing wave of youth smoking that began in the U.S. However, many teens have turned to electronic cigarettes as a healthier way to enjoy their daily dose of nicotine. In order to reduce the selling point of the puff bar to teens, manufacturers will need to include more health-related language on their marketing materials.